Exploring

1:1 Meeting Scheduling for Conferences

We're exploring AI-scheduled 1:1 meetings at small conferences — matched pairs, booked into slots. If you run hosted-buyer-style meetings, help shape it.

EventIntro's matching engine powers event and cohort networking today. We're exploring scheduled 1:1 meetings at conferences as a next step — if this is your problem, tell us about it below and help shape what we build.

Who this is for

Organizers running hosted-buyer or curated 1:1 meeting programs.
Small conferences that want matched meetings booked into time slots.
Teams doing meeting scheduling manually or with a generic booking tool.

Matching is the smart half; scheduling is the missing half

Hosted-buyer programs and curated 1:1 tracks live or die on two things: who gets paired, and how those pairs fit into a finite day. EventIntro already does the first — deciding who should meet whom is exactly what the engine is for. Booking matched pairs into concrete time slots and juggling the grid is the second half, and it's what we're exploring rather than shipping.

Why this beats a booking tool

A calendar tool schedules a meeting once you've decided to have it; it has no view on whether the meeting is worth having. The value here runs the other way — the matching drives the schedule, so the day fills with pairs who should talk instead of whoever grabbed a slot first. Turning rankings into a clash-free timetable is the specific build we'd design with organizers.

Shape the build

If you run matched 1:1 meetings at a conference, tell us how scheduling works today and where it hurts. This page measures whether the scheduling layer is worth building; your input decides, and early respondents get first access.

Frequently asked questions

Can EventIntro schedule 1:1 meetings now?

It produces the matches — who should meet whom — which is the intelligent half of the problem. The other half, booking matched pairs into concrete time slots and managing the grid, is what we're exploring, not something we ship today. This page measures whether it's worth building.

How is this different from a calendar tool?

A calendar tool books a meeting once you've decided who to meet; it has no opinion on who that should be. The value here is the matching driving the schedule — pairing the people who should talk, then fitting those pairs into the day.

How do I influence it?

Tell us how your meeting program runs today and what's painful. Early respondents shape the build and get first access.

Thanks — we've got it.
We read every one of these. We'll be in touch at the address you gave us.